The Editor-in-Chief or Editor of the Journal is responsible for deciding which of the research papers or articles submitted to the journal should be published. The publishing decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's reviewers. The Editor-in-Chief or Editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
📑 Duties of Editors
📑 Decision on the Publication of Articles
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published, guided by the journal's editorial policies and legal obligations regarding copyright and plagiarism. They may consult with other editors or reviewers to reach a final decision.
⚖ Fair Play
Manuscripts should be assessed based solely on their intellectual worth, without any consideration given to the author's ethnicity, citizenship, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, or any other personal characteristics.
🔒 Confidentiality
The Editor-in-Chief and editorial staff should not reveal any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone except the authors, reviewers/potential reviewers, and editorial advisers.
🔍 Plagiarism
The Editor-in-Chief or authorised editorial staff should use appropriate software or tools to check the originality and similarity of all submitted manuscripts. If any manuscript is found to have plagiarised content from published or unpublished works by other authors, it will face plagiarism sanctions.
🚫 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Editors should refrain from evaluating manuscripts if they have conflicts of interest stemming from collaborative, competitive, or other relationships with the authors, institutions, or companies associated with the manuscripts.
🎯 Duties of Reviewers
🎯 Standards of Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted objectively, without resorting to personal criticism. Reviewers should clearly express their comments by providing supporting arguments to back up their claims.
📁 Contribution to Editorial Decision
Proper peer review helps the Editor-in-Chief in making informed decisions about the manuscript. Additionally, it provides a platform for constructive editorial communications between the author and reviewers that may lead to an improvement in the quality of the paper.
🔒 Confidentiality
Receiving a manuscript for review is confidential. It should not be shared or discussed with anyone else unless authorised by the Editor-in-Chief. Any privileged ideas or information obtained during the peer review process must be kept confidential and should not be used for any other purpose.
⏱ Promptness
If a chosen reviewer feels unqualified to assess the assigned manuscript or cannot provide a timely review, they should inform the Editor-in-Charge and decline participation in the review.
🚫 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Reviewers should not evaluate manuscripts if they have conflicts of interest stemming from competitive, collaborative, or other associations with the authors, institutions, or companies relevant to the manuscripts.
📚 Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify pertinent published articles that the authors have not cited. Any statement previously reported elsewhere should include the relevant citation. Reviewers should also alert the Editor-in-Charge to any significant overlap or similarity between the manuscript under review and any other published work.
📝 Duties of Authors
📄 Multiple and Concurrent Publications
Authors should not publish or submit manuscripts that describe the same research in more than one journal or publication, whether in the same or different languages. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently is against publishing ethics and is not acceptable.
🔍 Originality and Plagiarism
Authors should warrant that their article is completely original and not a reproduction of previously published works or AI-generated work. If authors have used any pre-existing words or work, they must properly quote or cite them. When authors use generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in writing the article, they should ensure that these technologies are used only to improve the language and readability of the work.
👥 Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be restricted to individuals who have made a substantial contribution to the conception, analysis, design, implementation, or interpretation of the study. All those who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. Authors should not include AI or AI-assisted technologies as authors or co-authors in their manuscripts, nor should they cite AI as an author. Authorship carries responsibilities and tasks that are unique to human beings.
💼 Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose any substantive or financial conflicts of interest in their manuscript that may potentially influence the results or interpretation. Additionally, all sources of financial or substantive support for the study should be fully disclosed.
📝 Reporting Standards
Authors must provide an accurate and truthful account of the work conducted, along with an impartial discussion of its importance. They should represent the underlying data accurately in the manuscript, including sufficient details and references to enable others to replicate the study.
📚 Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
📊 Data Access and Retention
Authors may be requested to provide the raw data relating to their study for editorial or peer review, and must be willing to allow public access to it if feasible. They must keep the data available for a reasonable period after publication.
⚠ Fundamental Errors in Published Works
If an author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they must immediately inform the journal editorial office or Editor and collaborate with them to correct or retract the paper.
🏢 Duties of Publishers
🏢 Publisher Responsibilities
A publisher has a responsibility to establish journal policies and ensure they are followed, particularly regarding research ethics, editorial independence, transparency, integrity, authorship, and peer review. The publisher should review these policies periodically, particularly in light of new recommendations from organisations such as COPE, and ensure that journal content is published promptly.
⚠ Handling of Unethical Publishing Behavior
If an article is suspected of plagiarism, fraudulent publication, or academic misconduct, the publisher along with the Editor-in-Charge should take corrective action to investigate and address the issue. This may include clarifying or amending the article, issuing a correction or retraction, or taking further disciplinary action as necessary.
🔓 Access to Journal Content
The publisher has a responsibility to ensure that scholarly research is permanently available and preserved, including through the use of digital archiving systems. They should also partner with organisations that specialise in maintaining digital records and certify that the research is accessible to the public.
🔒 Confidentiality
The publisher must respect the privacy of authors and peer reviewers.
💾 Digital Preservation Policy
Digital preservation involves processes and actions to safeguard digital information, ensuring its backup and distribution for sustained accessibility over the long term. The journal's digital content is highly valuable, and the following measures are taken to ensure its ongoing accessibility and preservation:
Website Archiving
All electronic content (website, manuscripts, etc.) is stored in three separate locations. One server hosts the content online, while identical copies are kept as backups on two other sources. Should one server fail, any of the backup sources can be activated to bring the website back online, typically within 12–48 hours.
Self-Archiving
Authors should archive the final version of their published papers in personal or institutional repositories immediately after publication.
Abstracting / Indexing Services
The Abstracting/Indexing databases of the journal contain essential information about the articles. These databases not only archive metadata but also store electronic versions of the articles, providing scientific community members with an alternative access route to the journal's platform.
If the Journal Stops Publishing
The journal is expected to continue publishing for the foreseeable future. In the unlikely event that circumstances force us to cease publication, published articles will remain online and accessible for at least 10 more years. In exceptional cases, the content will be accessible through PKP PN to ensure long-term preservation of these resources.
📢 Advertising Policy
- All advertisements must receive approval from the publisher or the Editor-in-Chief.
- Advertisements are entirely separate from editorial decisions. The Editorial Board does not endorse any product or service advertised in the journal.
- Advertisements are presented in a distinct section from the content and are clearly separated from editorial material.
- Editorial content remains independent of financial or commercial interests or any arrangements with sponsors or advertising clients.
- Advertisers have no influence over search results in the publisher's journal.
- All advertisements must be non-discriminatory and comply with applicable laws.
- Advertisements should include the advertiser's trademark or signature.
- The publisher does not disclose personally identifiable data on website users.
- Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser and the product or service offered. Exaggerated language is not permitted.
- Advertisements may be removed from the journal site at the request of the Editor(s)-in-Chief or Publisher.
- The journal prohibits treatment-specific or drug-specific campaigns from targeting specific articles or relevant content pages.